Audit quality fight turns nasty
Big firms are fighting proposed rules on external oversight
GONE are the days when company bosses could dismiss their non-executive directors, as the maverick British businessman Tiny Rowland did in the 1980s, as mere “baubles on a Christmas tree”. Multiple rounds of corporate governance reforms later, independent board members are not just decorative, but in fact a critical pillar of our trust in public markets.
The heads of US audit firms, which have a role just as crucial to the integrity of capital markets by verifying company accounts, are apparently more sceptical about formalising external oversight in regulation.
A new rule agreed by the US audit regulator, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), will force each of the biggest firms to establish a body to oversee quality control, and to make sure at least one person on it comes from outside the firm.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
MAS, bank CEOs convene over AI cyberthreats; boards told to own risks, not leave to IT teams
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
LTA circular to potential EV charger owners reveals hundreds of e-mail addresses under carbon copy feature