Cheaper AI isn’t the panacea
There’s still a broad question of how useful generative AI can be to a business’ bottom line
FOR a technology that promises to help businesses cut costs, artificial intelligence (AI) has had a big problem with being so costly.
AI’s scaling laws, which say that you need more computing power to make more powerful models, have put tech companies on a race to spend billions of dollars building vast data centres and buying powerful chips – costs they can’t help passing on to their customers. Google’s AI tool for generating documents or e-mails for office workers is not cheap. It adds US$20 to their employer’s monthly US$6 bill for the company’s Workspace suite, per staff member. Microsoft Corp’s Copilot AI assistant costs US$30 a month per worker.
Meanwhile, the cost of deploying AI directly into a company’s systems can cost between US$5 million and US$20 million, according to research firm Gartner, which estimates that 30 per cent of generative AI projects will be abandoned by the end of 2025 in part because of all that expense.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
MAS convenes bank CEOs over AI cyberthreats; boards told to own risks, not leave to IT teams
Is it time to scrap COE categories for cars?