China didn’t just survive decoupling, it turned it into strategy
For foreign investors and policymakers, the lesson is clear – while one side drew lines, the other built bridges
WHEN the first Trump administration pushed for decoupling from China, it was framed as a geopolitical warning shot. Decoupling was meant to be a chokehold – a way to cut China off from capital, consumers, and core technologies. However, Beijing did not panic, it treated the move as a strategic signal. Rather than resist, China began quietly reconfiguring its global economic footprint.
Washington thought it was cornering China. US President Donald Trump thought he held the cards, controlled the chips and set the rules. But he missed one inconvenient truth: Most of those cards were printed, packed, and shipped from factories in China.
No grand speeches. No drama. Just deliberate moves: Diversifying supply chains, investing abroad, and pushing local tech to close the gap. While American legislators staged hearings, Chinese firms inked deals. While one side debated restrictions, the other redrew its map.
TRENDING NOW
Buyer for England striker Harry Kane’s former mansion must pay £3.4 million after abandoning deal
Ohmyhome Ltd sells real estate business for US$1 due to poor business and continued losses
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
What’s wrong with Orchard Road? Experts weigh in on the street’s cachet and its future