Climate first…or last?
A new study on sustainability reporting across Asia-Pacific finds that in many cases, companies disclose long lists of ESG risks without truly understanding which ones are strategic, financially material or reflective of stakeholder concerns
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
AS SUSTAINABILITY disclosures edge towards becoming mandatory in many jurisdictions rather than an optional public relations tool, a critical question arises: How do companies decide what really matters?
The answer lies in a term central to every sustainability report yet often poorly understood: “materiality assessment”.
Materiality assessments are intended to help companies identify the most significant sustainability-related risks and opportunities (SROs) – those that can affect business performance or impact people and the planet. If done well, a materiality assessment should be the backbone of a sustainability strategy. Done poorly, it can mask risks, mislead stakeholders and derail corporate efforts to contribute meaningfully to the climate transition.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Shelving S$5 billion office redevelopment plan proved ‘wise’ as geopolitical risks mount: OCBC chairman
Eurokars Group introduces rental car franchises Enterprise Rent-A-Car, National Car Rental, and Alamo to Singapore
20 photos that show how dramatically Singapore has changed in two decades
Singapore’s key exports up 15.3% in March from electronics surge, exceeding forecasts