Clearer guidelines needed to help investors requisition EGMs
RECENT boardroom tussles, including at companies such as Asti Holdings and USP Group , are turning the spotlight again on the requisitioning of extraordinary general meetings (EGMs) by dissident shareholders.
Such scuffles, which usually result in a public battle between the requisitioning parties and the incumbent directors, are not uncommon. And they sometimes get escalated to the courts.
In past cases involving Singapore Exchange (SGX)-listed companies, parties have been known to disagree on nearly everything. In more than one instance, this has led to a stalemate – with the wider body of shareholders unable to even cast their votes and decide on the matters at hand.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
OCBC consumer banking chief Sunny Quek aims to double wealth business by 2029
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
Hengli’s ex-Singapore unit dismisses staff after US sanctions, at risk of being wound down: sources