Frustration, not fortitude, in the restaurant business
The legal doctrine should be applied to allow restaurants to opt out of their lease without default, instead of trudging along on the back of rental reliefs.
THE government's rental reliefs under the Covid-19 (Temporary Measures) Act and its accompanying Amendment Act reflect the recognition that the obligation to pay rent has become impossible for restaurants (and other commercial tenants) to perform.
In fact, that these tenants cannot pay rent is precisely the justification offered by the government to support it rolling out the whole suite of rental reliefs. It is widely known that the restaurant industry is sinking, and the jury is still out on whether these rental reliefs - which include rent deferments, rental waivers, and a statutory repayment schedule by instalment - will add up to something meaningful for food and beverage (F&B) operators.
Indeed, as Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam stated in Parliament, the relief framework is no silver bullet and some businesses will still fail despite the extra help with rent. Meanwhile, all this chatter pokes and prods at the white elephant in the room, provoking the unavoidable question: Can restaurants that no longer feel their business is viable opt out of their lease without default, instead of trudging painfully along just because the rental reliefs appear to offer a glimmer of hope? Are these leases frustrated?
TRENDING NOW
Abandoned ‘Titanic’, failing ‘ancient towns’: Why China’s tourism boom leaves white elephants behind
Private equity giant Carlyle can grow bigger but needs to stay on its toes: co-founder David Rubenstein
Singapore to establish over-the-counter gold clearing system, central bank vaulting by end-2026
Singapore public sector commands highest AI salary premium as job postings surge: PwC study