Inversions merely crystalise America's critical dilemmas
There is an inherent contradiction, for example, in a world with separate country-by-country taxation while multinationals treat the world as one economic space.
New Brunswick
THE US presidential election campaign triggers debate every four years over offshoring, outsourcing and tax-avoidance schemes by corporations. This year is no exception, and the issue of "inversions" - companies moving their headquarters abroad to reduce taxes - has candidates from both parties crying foul. The issue highlights the negative consequences of globalisation and serves as an effective battle cry to rally voters. A closer look shows why this is a visceral political issue even though the economic impact is less than meets the eye.
In simple terms, an inversion is when a US company shifts corporate headquarters to a country such as Ireland where corporate taxes max out at 12.5 per cent, as compared to the maximum 35 per cent US tax rate, not including additional taxes imposed by states. For large multinational firms, the annual savings for companies - and lost tax revenues for the government - can be in the billions.
TRENDING NOW
OUE Reit selling Crowne Plaza Changi Airport for S$500 million; unitholders to get special payout
Buyer for England striker Harry Kane’s former mansion must pay £3.4 million after abandoning deal
Singapore releases Economic Strategy Review Final Report with more detailed proposals
Frasers Property proposes S$2.1 billion restructuring of hospitality portfolio