Lessons for Truss when economic orthodoxy bites back
The UK prime minister’s experiment fails to take account of unforeseen consequences in the real world
THE disdain for economic orthodoxy was dripping from Liz Truss’s lips in the first big interview of her campaign to become Conservative party leader. “We have had a consensus of the Treasury, of economists, with the Financial Times, with other outlets, peddling a particular type of economic policy for 20 years. It hasn’t delivered growth,” she said.
This column is not a defence of the FT, but an explanation to the UK’s new prime minister of what economic orthodoxy is and what it is not. Having had a crash course in financial market punishment after the “mini” Budget last Friday (Sep 23), her new government might benefit from taking note.
Despite accusations that economic orthodoxy is driven by a cosy cabal of the Davos-attending global elite, the truth is much more mundane. Economic orthodoxy is not ideological but simply the accumulated knowledge and experience of what tends to work best. It is not the slave of some defunct economist, but a constantly evolving body of thinking and experimenting in the real world. It is always open to challenge.
TRENDING NOW
CSE Global independent director quits after clashes with chairman Eugene Lai over board refresh
Cat A COE rate exceeds Cat B for third time in 4 months; premiums largely down
What’s wrong with Orchard Road? Experts weigh in on the street’s cachet and its future
Singapore workers experiencing rising anxiety; signs of fallout from pressure to use AI