Noble should pay heed to its corporate governance
Its practices in picking its board of directors, remuneration policy and degree of disclosure fly in the face of a company that is reportedly working on improving transparency.
Add BT as a preferred source
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
LATEST: Noble Group appoints Cofco's president to board
THE third report issued by Iceberg Research and some commentators have touched on the corporate governance of Noble Group, in particular the long tenure of some of its independent directors. However, there has not been an in-depth assessment of its corporate governance.
The Governance and Transparency Index (GTI), published by The Business Times and the National University of Singapore's Centre for Governance, Institutions and Organisations (CGIO) and sponsored by CPA Australia, provides an indication of the overall quality of Noble's corporate governance and transparency. The 2014 GTI gave it an overall score of 41, placing it in 293rd position in a field of 644 companies covered. This was an unusually low ranking for such a large company. Interestingly, in 2013, Noble was ranked far lower - at 503 - with a score of just 28.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
StarHub hands Ensign InfoSecurity control back to Temasek in S$115 million deal, books S$200 million gain
Singaporeans can now buy record amount of yen per Singdollar
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
Keppel DC Reit posts 13.2% higher Q1 DPU of S$0.02833 on strong portfolio performance
