Predicting random shocks
DESPITE nearly 100 years of development in econometrics, the treatment of random shocks remains quite naïve. Economists overuse normal distribution, the classic bell curve, to model the influence of variables, filtering out shocks. The logic is that most shocks are small. Larger shocks are less likely. Standard deviations measure departures from the average. Almost all shocks, 95 per cent of them, are within two standard deviations of the average.
But that model may be deceptive. Benoit Mandelbrot, the French mathematician, tried for decades to convince econometricians that the distribution of random variables, shocks, may be non-normal. He was ignored as either too naïve or too sophisticated to be useful. The efficient markets hypothesis, promoted by the economist Eugene Fama, prevailed.
The 2008 financial crisis blew a big hole in the efficient markets hypothesis. A massive shock shook the stock market. If Dr Mandelbrot's non-normal distribution model was followed, it may have been anticipated.
TRENDING NOW
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
Ohmyhome Ltd sells real estate business for token US$1 due to poor business and continued losses
Surbana Jurong group CEO Sean Chiao to step down; search for successor under way
What’s wrong with Orchard Road? Experts weigh in on the street’s cachet and its future