Re-imagining the Code for an ESG world
Singapore should consider more fully embedding “environmental” and “social” issues into the corporate governance principles, provisions and guidance.
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
ONE of the key decisions the Corporate Governance Committee which developed the first Code of Corporate Governance in Singapore had to make was whether to base it on the shareholder or stakeholder model. It opted for the shareholder model, although it recognised that enhancing long-term shareholder value requires the interests of other stakeholders to be taken into account. The first paragraph of its report defined corporate governance as follows:
“Corporate governance refers to the processes and structure by which the business and affairs of the company are directed and managed, in order to enhance long term shareholder value through enhancing corporate performance and accountability, whilst taking into account the interests of other stakeholders. Good corporate governance embodies both enterprise (performance) and accountability (conformance).”
I believe it was the right decision to adopt the shareholder model at that time, to provide a clear focus for companies and boards.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
‘Boring’ is the new black: The stars are aligning for a Singapore stock market revival
Near sell-out launches in March boost developer sales to 1,300 units after four slow months
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
Genting Singapore’s Lim Kok Thay receives S$7.5 million pay package for FY2025