MARK TO MARKET
·
SUBSCRIBERS

Readers hated my take on bank phishing scams, but here’s what they are missing

Concern about moral hazard in making banks responsible for phishing scam losses might be misplaced

Ben Paul
Published Mon, Aug 1, 2022 · 05:50 AM
    • MAS said on Jul 18 that the development of the framework for equitable sharing of losses from scams is taking longer than expected “in view of the complexity of the issues”
    • MAS said on Jul 18 that the development of the framework for equitable sharing of losses from scams is taking longer than expected “in view of the complexity of the issues” BT FILE

    DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.

    THIS column received a lot of negative feedback after it said on Jul 11 that Singapore banks ought to bear the losses from phishing scams.

    The notion that depositors should get their money back after giving away their bank credentials to unknown persons did not sit well with many readers.

    It was pointed out to me that the scammers had not hacked into the computer systems of any bank. It was the depositors who had let them in.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.