Why battle for Net neutrality in the US matters globally
At stake could be an Internet where all information is treated equally, promoting openness and free trade; a non-neutral Web benefits a few at the expense of many.
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
NET neutrality has been a contentious topic around the world for more than a few years now but the truth of the matter is, it shouldn't be contentious at all. The Internet - though not necessarily intended as such when it was created - has become the true equaliser and must remain that way.
It doesn't matter if you're big or small, rich or poor: on the Internet your voice can be heard and then multiplied a billion times over and span the globe. A neutral Internet protects these voices, giving parity to all data, regardless of its source.
So why then, is there such a contentious debate over Net neutrality? Why does the United States seem at times frighteningly close to passing legislation which would destroy that neutrality and create an Internet controlled by a small group of multimedia conglomerates?
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Higher costs, lower returns: Why are Singaporeans still betting on real estate?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant