Will 'worst trade treaty' ride to Trump's rescue?
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
THE new United States-Mexico-Canada agreement (USMCA), one of the most comprehensive trade agreements outside the EU, comes into force on Wednesday. While the deal remains shrouded in deep political controversy, its achievement underlines the limits to the current deglobalisation era that has been fuelled by the coronavirus crisis.
The USMCA - which is in effect a North America Free Trade Agreement (Nafta) 2.0 - will serve as a political cornerstone of economic relations within the continent, including the more than US$1 trillion in annual trilateral trade. Yet amid the celebrations this coming week of what even "America First" President Donald Trump has previously called a "wonderful" and "historical transaction", there remains much political angst.
Nafta, originally signed in 1994 during Bill Clinton's presidency, was the first major trilateral trade accord negotiated between a developing country (Mexico) and developed counterparts (United States and Canada). That distinctive era, soon after the end of the Cold War, saw economic globalisation largely unchallenged as a political orthodoxy across much the world.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Shelving S$5 billion office redevelopment plan proved ‘wise’ as geopolitical risks mount: OCBC chairman
Why where you park your joint venture matters: Lessons from a US$689 million shareholder dispute
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
Singaporeans can now buy record amount of yen per Singdollar