Convenience vs financial yields: Mitigating the trade-offs
It might seem like a digital-age bank run, but Chocolate Finance’s liquidity crunch reflects the structural differences between fintechs and traditional banks
[SINGAPORE] Singapore-based fintech Chocolate Finance recently faced a surge in withdrawal requests, prompting it to pause instant withdrawals and shift to a standard redemption timeline of three to ten days. As a licensed fund manager, the company pools customer funds into short-term investments such as money market and bond funds. The episode sparked comparisons to a bank run, but a closer look reveals that it is primarily a liquidity management challenge rather than a solvency issue.
How Chocolate Finance manages liquidity
Unlike traditional banks that use deposits to fund loans while maintaining fractional reserves, Chocolate Finance invests in liquid, low-risk financial instruments. When a customer withdraws, the firm must redeem fund holdings, a process that typically takes a few days (T+3 settlement).
To facilitate instant withdrawals, Chocolate Finance operated a liquidity programme, where it fronted withdrawal payments from its own capital while awaiting fund redemptions. Under normal conditions, inflows and outflows balanced, allowing the system to function smoothly.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services