Data is changing shareholder capitalism
Corporations should still strive to maximise investor returns, but in some cases, other values should take precedence
IF AMERICA’S CEOs have learned one lesson over the last half decade, it’s this: Avoid politics. It is the right lesson – as usual, Milton Friedman was correct, the primary purpose of a business should be to increase its profits – but the rapidly changing nature of the economy calls for an update: Avoid politics whenever possible, but never when necessary.
The recent history of corporate activism is instructive. Just before the pandemic, the chief executives of 181 of the largest US corporations signed a pledge to “lead their companies for the benefit of all stakeholders”, not just shareholders.
They essentially promised to pursue a better world beyond profits. It did not go well. After several prominent instances of companies or executives getting burned for taking political stances – just ask Budweiser or Elon Musk – most companies now just stick to business or at least stay silent.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
MAS convenes bank CEOs over AI cyberthreats; boards told to own risks, not leave to IT teams
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
LTA circular to potential EV charger owners reveals hundreds of e-mail addresses under carbon copy feature