SUBSCRIBERS

Dilemmas of deterrence

Factors such as credibility are crucial to the success of countries’ efforts to prevent undesirable behaviour by others. But studying the limits of these efforts is equally important for identifying a strategy that works.

    • When South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol met with US President Joe Biden in Washington in April, they agreed that the US would station a nuclear-armed submarine near the Korean Peninsula and deepen consultations with South Korea on nuclear and strategic planning.
    • When South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol met with US President Joe Biden in Washington in April, they agreed that the US would station a nuclear-armed submarine near the Korean Peninsula and deepen consultations with South Korea on nuclear and strategic planning. PHOTO: EPA-EFE
    Joseph S Nye
    Published Thu, May 4, 2023 · 05:50 AM

    CAMBRIDGE – We live in a world where geopolitical stability relies largely on deterrence. But how can we prove that deterrence works?

    Consider the ongoing war in Europe. Beginning in December 2021, US President Joe Biden warned Russian President Vladimir Putin that Russia would face severe new sanctions if he invaded Ukraine, to no avail. Then, when the United States and its European allies thwarted Russia’s plans by providing arms to Ukraine, Putin brandished the nuclear option. But Western aid continued unabated.

    Did deterrence fail or succeed? Answering this question poses a challenge because it requires assessing what would have occurred absent the threat. It is hard to prove a negative. If I put a sign on my front door saying, “No Elephants”, and there are no elephants in my house, did I deter them? It depends on the likelihood of literate elephants entering in the first place.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services