‘Dirty’ resources sector needs decarbonisation, not divestment
Sustainability-focused investors must stay engaged to scale up the supply of metals and minerals for the world’s energy transition
THE metals and mining industry in the Asia-Pacific has a bad reputation among ESG (environmental, social and governance) investors. It is seen as dirty and destructive, or even corrupt and dangerous – at times, it must be said, with good reason.
The resources sector, however, will be crucial to the world’s energy transition. Clean energy technologies require far more lithium, nickel, copper, cobalt and other minerals than their fossil-fuel counterparts – an electric car uses five times more minerals than a combustion engine one, for example – and a supply crunch is looming.
The pathway to net-zero emissions requires immense investment in green technology and infrastructure, all of which will cause global demand for minerals to surge. China alone will need to spend an additional US$17 trillion on green infrastructure and technology …
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
ESG Insights
An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Opinion & Features
Middle East violence heightens market fears of rate hikes, inflation
Inside TSMC chairman Mark Liu's short but impactful reign
Tensions mount in foreign exchange markets as US dollar surges
Caught up in crypto fever? Heed lessons from 2022
Europe’s red Letta day to consider major reforms
How sustainable procurement can drive growth