Does trade cause peace? Ask an economist
Researchers have been trawling history to measure the pacifying effects of moving goods around
IN CASE you haven’t heard the embarrassing tale of the British writer Norman Angell, here’s how it goes: In a bestselling book, The Great Illusion, he argued that the economic ties between European nations were so strong that war was impossible. His book was such a hit that he produced several editions, including a special bulked-up version that hit US bookshops in 1913.
A closer look at Angell’s writing reveals falsehoods within this folklore. In the 1913 edition of his book, he wrote: “War is not impossible, and no responsible pacifist ever said it was; it is not the likelihood of war that is the illusion, but its benefits.” His argument was more subtle than is often remembered – trade had made war so expensive that any leader with half a brain should avoid it. It followed that stronger economic connections should help to sustain peace.
It’s a nice idea, but does it hold up? Two recent data points seem supportive.
TRENDING NOW
Singapore private housing is ‘decoupling’ from HDB market as buyer pools diverge: NUS survey
Simba’s 5G spectrum hurdle may accelerate Singapore’s telco market reset
Yen hits 40-year low in historic slide that’s rattled Japan
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan