Does trade cause peace? Ask an economist
Researchers have been trawling history to measure the pacifying effects of moving goods around
IN CASE you haven’t heard the embarrassing tale of the British writer Norman Angell, here’s how it goes: In a bestselling book, The Great Illusion, he argued that the economic ties between European nations were so strong that war was impossible. His book was such a hit that he produced several editions, including a special bulked-up version that hit US bookshops in 1913.
A closer look at Angell’s writing reveals falsehoods within this folklore. In the 1913 edition of his book, he wrote: “War is not impossible, and no responsible pacifist ever said it was; it is not the likelihood of war that is the illusion, but its benefits.” His argument was more subtle than is often remembered – trade had made war so expensive that any leader with half a brain should avoid it. It followed that stronger economic connections should help to sustain peace.
It’s a nice idea, but does it hold up? Two recent data points seem supportive.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
DBS CEO Tan Su Shan strikes upbeat tone on deposits, wealth growth after strong Q1
How China’s young workers are securing their future even as AI disrupts job market, triggers pay cuts
Middle East-linked energy supply shocks put Asean Power Grid back in focus
Malaysia’s 8th richest man Jeffrey Cheah wants Sunway business to last 10 generations