Does trade cause peace? Ask an economist
Researchers have been trawling history to measure the pacifying effects of moving goods around
IN CASE you haven’t heard the embarrassing tale of the British writer Norman Angell, here’s how it goes: In a bestselling book, The Great Illusion, he argued that the economic ties between European nations were so strong that war was impossible. His book was such a hit that he produced several editions, including a special bulked-up version that hit US bookshops in 1913.
A closer look at Angell’s writing reveals falsehoods within this folklore. In the 1913 edition of his book, he wrote: “War is not impossible, and no responsible pacifist ever said it was; it is not the likelihood of war that is the illusion, but its benefits.” His argument was more subtle than is often remembered – trade had made war so expensive that any leader with half a brain should avoid it. It followed that stronger economic connections should help to sustain peace.
It’s a nice idea, but does it hold up? Two recent data points seem supportive.
TRENDING NOW
‘I felt like dying’: Thai Singha beer scion speaks up after disclosure of alleged sexual abuse
DBS to launch tokenised physical gold for retail customers in Singapore
S$500 CDC vouchers for all Singaporean households from June 11; Government ready to do more if needed: DPM Gan
Singapore men, are you OK?