The ESG dilemma: Balancing real progress with investor scepticism
THE growing prominence of environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations in Singapore’s corporate landscape has been met with both enthusiasm and scepticism. While the government has implemented various initiatives to promote sustainable business practices, there has been some pushback against the ESG agenda, driven by concerns over operational challenges, measurement difficulties and the risk of greenwashing.
A recent landmark case at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos) on May 21, 2024, has brought these issues to the forefront. Itlos classified greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a form of marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos).
This is a groundbreaking recognition linking atmospheric pollution directly to marine health.
TRENDING NOW
Not in education, employment or training: Why more Hong Kong youths are opting out of work
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
Lamborghini-driving boss of Eminent Frog Porridge charged with S$3.8 million tax evasion, money laundering
Can Labubu and Pop Mart survive the future?