Google’s antitrust loss is a hollow victory for regulators
The US Justice Department notches a win, but it comes way too late to curb the company’s dominance in search
IN A “blockbuster” ruling published Monday (Aug 5), US judge Amit Mehta stated it clearly enough: “Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly.”
As most media outlets have reported, it is the most significant victory for the antitrust hawks since Microsoft lost its famous case in the 1990s. That one was about access to web browsers. The Google case was about access to search engines. What they both share in common is a question around the competitive benefit of being the default option presented to users. The court ruled that Google’s payment of billions of dollars for the privilege was illegal.
Next comes a series of hearings to determine what should be done about it. This is where it gets tricky – and dispiriting. Unfortunately, if the goal is to curb Google’s dominance, the options floated so far are uninspiring at best.
TRENDING NOW
Once staunchly pro-China, Malaysian Chinese businesses are now distancing themselves from Beijing
Britain’s mansion tax shows the difficulty of targeting wealth
Three hats, one goal: How Ng Kian Swan runs sustainability at NUHS
COE review: The gap between luxury and mass-market cars isn’t the only one worth bridging
