Google’s antitrust loss is a hollow victory for regulators
The US Justice Department notches a win, but it comes way too late to curb the company’s dominance in search
Add BT as a preferred source
IN A “blockbuster” ruling published Monday (Aug 5), US judge Amit Mehta stated it clearly enough: “Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly.”
As most media outlets have reported, it is the most significant victory for the antitrust hawks since Microsoft lost its famous case in the 1990s. That one was about access to web browsers. The Google case was about access to search engines. What they both share in common is a question around the competitive benefit of being the default option presented to users. The court ruled that Google’s payment of billions of dollars for the privilege was illegal.
Next comes a series of hearings to determine what should be done about it. This is where it gets tricky – and dispiriting. Unfortunately, if the goal is to curb Google’s dominance, the options floated so far are uninspiring at best.
TRENDING NOW
Canada’s fight with the US has far bigger stakes than trade
Can Bali swop beach capital for global capital without the skyscrapers?
Stripe’s Apac business should grow faster than any other region, says its chief revenue officer
What’s luck got to do with it? Everything, says Malaysian jewellery king Tomei’s chief
