If AI is a public good, nationalisation should be considered
A technology so consequential, potentially disruptive and paradigm-shifting cannot be managed through basic regulation alone
Add BT as a preferred source
ARTIFICIAL intelligence could well prove to be the most profoundly consequential technology in human history. It is already challenging long-held notions of intelligence and creativity, promising to hasten scientific progress, and raising uncertainties about the future of jobs.
In these tantalising times, there is no shortage of techno-optimists who insist that we stand on the cusp of a world of super-abundance as AI usage will enable historic gains in productivity and prosperity.
Many economists, however, are not quite as sanguine. We worry about the gains being concentrated among a few, while large swaths of white-collar jobs are automated away.
TRENDING NOW
DBS completes US$1 billion significant risk transfer deal, a first for Singapore bank
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
Singapore private housing is ‘decoupling’ from HDB market as buyer pools diverge: NUS survey
Not in education, employment or training: Why more Hong Kong youths are opting out of work
