If AI is a public good, nationalisation should be considered
A technology so consequential, potentially disruptive and paradigm-shifting cannot be managed through basic regulation alone
ARTIFICIAL intelligence could well prove to be the most profoundly consequential technology in human history. It is already challenging long-held notions of intelligence and creativity, promising to hasten scientific progress, and raising uncertainties about the future of jobs.
In these tantalising times, there is no shortage of techno-optimists who insist that we stand on the cusp of a world of super-abundance as AI usage will enable historic gains in productivity and prosperity.
Many economists, however, are not quite as sanguine. We worry about the gains being concentrated among a few, while large swaths of white-collar jobs are automated away.
TRENDING NOW
Abandoned ‘Titanic’, failing ‘ancient towns’: Why China’s tourism boom leaves white elephants behind
‘I felt like dying’: Thai Singha beer scion speaks up after disclosure of alleged sexual abuse
SpaceX surge further boosts Saudi billionaire prince’s fortune
Singapore’s total employment growth slows in Q1; job vacancies dip while retrenchments inch up