If you can ‘like’ everything, do you value anything?
A new history of the ‘like’ button raises questions about what it means to interact effortlessly with others
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
IN THE early 2000s, software developers at several different Internet startups more or less independently came up with ways for users to express approval (and in some cases disapproval) with minimal effort and – a big deal in those days of slow Internet connections – without having to reload the page.
At news aggregator Digg.com, every “digg” or “bury” helped determine which articles would be featured and which would not. Online community Everything2.com similarly used upvotes and downvotes, as well as a “cool” button labelled “C!”. Blog platform Xanga had an “eProps” button that allowed readers who didn’t want to leave a comment to at least acknowledge that they appreciated a post.
Review site Yelp aimed to reward users for reviewing restaurants and other businesses by having readers label the reviews “useful”, “funny” or “cool”. Video purveyor Vimeo set out to emulate Digg, but as a company executive later told Fortune, “we didn’t want to call it ‘Diggs’, so we came up with ‘Likes’.”
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
‘Boring’ is the new black: The stars are aligning for a Singapore stock market revival
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report