Investors can’t always trust the data, and that’s okay
The spread of analytics has been good for almost everyone, but it’s more important than ever to separate the signal from the noise
I WAS attracted to finance because it promised some order amid chaos. Here was this market, with billions of transactions a day – and yet it managed to set a price for each asset, a price that put a literal number on the value of future risks, or more precisely how much people value those risks in the present day. The world is inundated with information – about individual companies, the macroeconomy, geopolitical risk, and about (not to get too meta) prices themselves – and this price incorporated all that, almost instantaneously. This is the definition of market efficiency.
Except for one small thing: This number, this price, has always been a little wrong. Data, as it turns out, has issues.
A roiling controversy in finance is a reminder that any certainty anyone ever had was an illusion. It concerns an academic paper that questions the benefits of factor investing, in which investors make decisions based on “factors” such as a company’s size or how its share price compares to the value of its assets. The theory is that such investments can deliver better returns than the market as a whole.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Opinion & Features
Why China’s electric cars are piling up at European ports
Relative measures can be absolutely wrong
Why the potential for another Donald Trump presidency is making Iran very nervous
Without a game changer, Sentosa Cove condos will continue underperforming
Iran-Israel strife throws out a lifeline to shippers
If the US economy is robust, why is the yield curve still inverted?