PERSPECTIVE
·
SUBSCRIBERS

Lessons from the euro’s first 25 years

The monetary union’s incomplete institutional framework is costly and dangerous

    • While the euro has delivered on some of its promises -- notably, maintaining price stability -- it has failed to facilitate the continent’s economic and political integration.
    • While the euro has delivered on some of its promises -- notably, maintaining price stability -- it has failed to facilitate the continent’s economic and political integration. PHOTO: AFP
    Published Fri, Feb 2, 2024 · 02:56 PM

    [FLORENCE] The 25th anniversary of the euro’s introduction, which has passed largely under the radar, offers an opportune moment to assess the current state of the greatest monetary experiment in modern history.

    The euro’s launch in January 1999 polarised economists. In the face of much scepticism – the late American economist Martin Feldstein even argued that the single currency could trigger a war in Europe – the euro’s architects envisioned a future characterised by macroeconomic stability, anchored by an independent central bank and a fiscal framework geared toward stability. Structural reforms, which the European Union’s member states were expected to implement, were meant to enhance the monetary union’s capacity to adjust to shocks.

    None of those scenarios materialised. Over the past quarter-century, the euro has shown extraordinary resilience, navigating through several critical challenges and defying early predictions of its collapse. But while the single currency has delivered on some of its promises – most notably, maintaining price stability for most of its existence – it has failed to boost Europe’s potential growth or facilitate the continent’s full economic and political integration.

    Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services