OCBC shouldn’t absorb Great Eastern entirely
AS A shareholder of OCBC, I am firmly of the view that it is not such a great idea for OCBC to absorb Great Eastern entirely. To do so would enhance the risk for OCBC as a bank and at the same time, inhibit the growth of Great Eastern as an insurer.
Basically, banking and insurance are two distinctively different types of business, each subject to entirely different underwriting considerations and approaches to risk management.
Given the increasingly higher risk in life insurance these days, with an aging population and the adverse impact of extreme weather conditions resulting from climate change on non-life business, Great Eastern must remain a strong and independent entity with a strong board of its own, equipped with adequate insurance expertise to ensure competent governance at the operating level.
TRENDING NOW
Abandoned ‘Titanic’, failing ‘ancient towns’: Why China’s tourism boom leaves white elephants behind
Private equity giant Carlyle can grow bigger but needs to stay on its toes: co-founder David Rubenstein
Singapore to establish over-the-counter gold clearing system, central bank vaulting by end-2026
Singapore public sector commands highest AI salary premium as job postings surge: PwC study