The paradox of democratic backsliding
Authoritarian and populist leaders are eroding civil liberties and weakening checks and balances. But many voters apparently love it. Why?
Add BT as a preferred source
[LONDON] Suppose someone curtails your freedoms and starts telling you what to do, perhaps even tying your hands behind your back and causing you pain. As awful as it sounds, you love it.
In the private realm, this phenomenon bears the name of Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, a 19th-century Austrian nobleman whose erotic fiction displayed a penchant for pain.
A similar phenomenon occurs in the public realm: authoritarian and populist leaders erode civil liberties, weaken democratic checks and balances, and browbeat the press and the judiciary. Yet, rather than taking to the streets in protest, many voters seem to love it.
TRENDING NOW
Lamborghini-driving boss of Eminent Frog Porridge charged with S$3.8 million tax evasion, money laundering
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
Palm oil stocks set to surge as Indonesia said to be scaling back export overhaul: analysts
Soon Su Lin to step down as Frasers Property Singapore CEO; Tan Wee Hsien named successor
