The paradox of democratic backsliding
Authoritarian and populist leaders are eroding civil liberties and weakening checks and balances. But many voters apparently love it. Why?
Add BT as a preferred source
[LONDON] Suppose someone curtails your freedoms and starts telling you what to do, perhaps even tying your hands behind your back and causing you pain. As awful as it sounds, you love it.
In the private realm, this phenomenon bears the name of Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, a 19th-century Austrian nobleman whose erotic fiction displayed a penchant for pain.
A similar phenomenon occurs in the public realm: authoritarian and populist leaders erode civil liberties, weaken democratic checks and balances, and browbeat the press and the judiciary. Yet, rather than taking to the streets in protest, many voters seem to love it.
TRENDING NOW
Abandoned ‘Titanic’, failing ‘ancient towns’: Why China’s tourism boom leaves white elephants behind
Private equity giant Carlyle can grow bigger but needs to stay on its toes: co-founder David Rubenstein
Singapore to establish over-the-counter gold clearing system, central bank vaulting by end-2026
Singapore public sector commands highest AI salary premium as job postings surge: PwC study
