Perks and perils of partisan talk on TV
NBC’s hiring of ex-Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, an election denier, has sparked backlash
TRYING to juice ratings in an election year, a major TV network in the US hired a pair of provocative commentators from the political establishment to inject some spiky opinion into its otherwise-staid campaign coverage.
The result – the Gore Vidal and William F Buckley Jr debates of 1968 – was a hit with viewers and an unexpected success for ABC News. It also inspired television news divisions to bring more partisan voices into their coverage, a trend that intensified at the dawn of the 24-hour cable news era in the early 1980s.
These days, the role of the “paid contributor” – a commentator on contract, to bloviate on demand – is fully baked into the TV news ecosystem. Typically, the role is occupied by a political veteran who can offer an insider perspective on the news of the day, drawing on experience as, say, an elected official, Beltway strategist or West Wing aide.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Opinion & Features
Indonesia spices up the global interest rate debate
In the robot-driven Fifth Industrial Revolution, human-centric skills remain key
Why decarbonisation is so hard
Not just fun and games: How mobile games have become big business
As COP29 planning begins, reforms needed to fulfil Paris ambition
Markets are embracing India’s Modi for what he won’t do