Presidential election offers lessons on independence
Appointment of independent directors should be subject to intense and frequent public deliberation
THERE was a lot said about the meaning of “independence” in the run-up to last Friday’s presidential election.
For some, the links each of the three candidates had to the government and the ruling party over the years was a key issue.
This is not surprising given that the president is a check of sorts on the government in relation to the use of past reserves, the appointment of key public officials, and the authorisation of corruption investigations.
TRENDING NOW
‘I felt like dying’: Thai Singha beer scion speaks up after disclosure of alleged sexual abuse
In a world of long-drawn crises, ‘wait and see’ may be a decreasingly tenable stance
SpaceX’s US$1.75 trillion IPO: How retail investors, including those in Singapore, can buy shares
The returnees: Inside China’s AI talent reversal