EDITORIAL
·
SUBSCRIBERS

Privatisation offers: address the issue of independence 

Published Thu, Jun 8, 2023 · 05:50 AM
    • While it has to be recognised that no single valuation methodology will bet met with universal acceptance, the crux of the problem lies in whether IFAs, who are appointed and paid by target companies, can be seen to be truly independent.
    • While it has to be recognised that no single valuation methodology will bet met with universal acceptance, the crux of the problem lies in whether IFAs, who are appointed and paid by target companies, can be seen to be truly independent. PHOTO: LIM YAOHUI, ST

    IN RECENT months, retail investors have been presented with several takeover-cum-privatisation offers by major shareholders. In all cases, there have been expressions of outrage amidst accusations of exploitation, with offer prices described as “lowball” – certainly from the standpoint of minorities who would want prices to be as high as possible.

    By the same token, “lowball” offers are understandable as no offeror would want to pay full value if they can avoid it.

    Regulators meanwhile are reluctant to intervene – again, understandably, given that the privatisation process calls for an independent financial adviser (IFA) to render an opinion on whether the offer is “fair and reasonable”.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.