RCEP: High hopes, disappointing start
The bloc’s initial performance has been underwhelming, possibly due to its pandemic-era launch and rising geopolitical tensions
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
ON AUG 2, Hong Kong’s chief executive John Lee announced that Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam had pledged their support for Hong Kong’s bid for “early accession” to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). As Hong Kong, along with other regional players, flock to join what has been dubbed a “game-changer” for regional trade, uncertainty lingers over whether RCEP can truly live up to the growing expectations.
RCEP was expected to revolutionise trade across the Asia-Pacific, promising to unify a fragmented landscape of trade agreements into the largest trade bloc in history. Representing 30 per cent of the world’s population and global GDP, the trade pact aimed to simplify and enhance regional trade dynamics.
Before RCEP, Asean had established a complex network of “Asean +1” free trade agreements (FTA) with the other RCEP members. RCEP, led by Asean, consolidates this intricate net of agreements and fills the gap in bilateral FTAs between Japan and the two other significant economies in North-east Asia, China and South Korea. With more applicants lining up, RCEP’s potential is unprecedented.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Middle East-linked energy supply shocks put Asean Power Grid back in focus
Beijing’s calculated silence on the Iran war
DPM Gan warns of 3 structural shifts to the global system that will bring greater challenges – and opportunities