THINKING ALOUD
·
SUBSCRIBERS

Should the Code of Corporate Governance be refreshed to complement the EQDP?

A look at the UK approach might be instructive

    •  A differentiated approach to governance – accounting for size – would provide smaller companies relief from overly prescriptive requirements designed for larger outfits.
    • A differentiated approach to governance – accounting for size – would provide smaller companies relief from overly prescriptive requirements designed for larger outfits. PHOTO: ST
    Published Tue, Jan 27, 2026 · 07:00 AM

    THE Singapore Code of Corporate Governance was last comprehensively revised in August 2018. Apart from targeted refinements – including the January 2023 move to hard-code the nine-year rule for independent directors – the framework has remained largely intact since.

    There is no doubt that the Code has served the Republic well. However, markets evolve and with the launch of the Equity Market Development Programme (EQDP), Singapore has entered a new phase of capital-market activism aimed squarely at improving liquidity, valuations and investor participation, particularly beyond the largest blue-chip names.

    These smaller firms stand to benefit the most from renewed investor interest, but confidence in this segment is often the thinnest and its disclosures lag those of blue chips. In short, governance standards among second and third-liners are below those of the larger companies.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.