Should you sacrifice some CPF Life income in favour of ILPs? Tread carefully
Consumers should educate themselves about the Retirement Sum Scheme and CPF Life, and view how these fit into their retirement plan
[SINGAPORE] AFTER covering personal finance for The Business Times for many years, I like to think that mis-selling of investment and insurance products would be few and far between.
But it seems this may not be so. In the Money Wisdom column in BT on May 22, Providend chief executive Christopher Tan recounted a pitch by a financial adviser (FA) representative to someone he knew, that she should fulfil only the Basic Retirement Sum (BRS) in her Central Provident Fund (CPF) account. The balance that would have gone to fulfil the Full Retirement Sum (FRS) was to be invested in an investment-linked policy (ILP).
This would result in a relatively lower CPF Life income payout which would then be supplemented by a supposedly higher income from the ILP.
TRENDING NOW
Thomson Medical Group names Cassandra Loh as acting CEO for its Singapore operations
Jacintha and Dick Lee revisit love – but remain guarded
‘Singapore cannot afford to keep losing clients to Dubai and Hong Kong’: Industry says faster onboarding vital for wealth hub edge
‘Capital guaranteed’ label for investment-linked policies misleading: MAS, Life Insurance Association