Statecraft and diplomacy in the age of political candour
Not many people have the time, the patience or the inclination to decipher what their leaders are trying to say
Add BT as a preferred source
IT USED to be that the concept of “plausible deniability” was considered a useful tool in statecraft. Not any more, it seems, considering US President Donald Trump’s recent pronouncements about the Venezuela situation. More on that later.
The expression itself had its first airing in the aftermath of the 1973 military coup in Chile. America’s intelligence services were deeply involved but Henry Kissinger, then US secretary of state, blithely denied that Washington had anything to do with the overthrow of an elected government, thereby elevating diplomatic double-talk to an art form.
Later, as the congressional Watergate hearing into the Nixon administration rolled on, it became apparent that “plausible denials” were pervasively used as a political tool in operations against perceived enemies of the White House.
TRENDING NOW
Not retirement, but a rewiring and fresh perspectives post-DBS, says Piyush Gupta
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
Hong Kong’s bad-debt bankers ramp up fire sales, liquidations as city’s distressed loan ratio hit a high
Power of payouts: A big chunk of the STI has just gone ex-dividend. What’s next?
