Statecraft and diplomacy in the age of political candour
Not many people have the time, the patience or the inclination to decipher what their leaders are trying to say
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
IT USED to be that the concept of “plausible deniability” was considered a useful tool in statecraft. Not any more, it seems, considering US President Donald Trump’s recent pronouncements about the Venezuela situation. More on that later.
The expression itself had its first airing in the aftermath of the 1973 military coup in Chile. America’s intelligence services were deeply involved but Henry Kissinger, then US secretary of state, blithely denied that Washington had anything to do with the overthrow of an elected government, thereby elevating diplomatic double-talk to an art form.
Later, as the congressional Watergate hearing into the Nixon administration rolled on, it became apparent that “plausible denials” were pervasively used as a political tool in operations against perceived enemies of the White House.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Vietnam formalises new state leadership, redefining ‘four pillars’ power balance
‘Largest Singapore commercial S-Reit proxy’: analysts say buy CICT shares after Paragon acquisition
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Why where you park your joint venture matters: Lessons from a US$689 million shareholder dispute