PERSPECTIVE
·
SUBSCRIBERS

There’s a ticking time bomb in Trump’s ‘big, beautiful Bill’

Investors are fretting about a clause that would penalise foreign holders of US assets

    • US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaking to the media after the House narrowly passed a Bill forwarding President Donald Trump's agenda on May 22. The  presence of section 899 shows that the Trump team is at least entertaining the idea of turning trade wars into capital wars, in the future.
    • US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaking to the media after the House narrowly passed a Bill forwarding President Donald Trump's agenda on May 22. The presence of section 899 shows that the Trump team is at least entertaining the idea of turning trade wars into capital wars, in the future. PHOTO: AFP
    Published Fri, May 30, 2025 · 05:00 PM

    THIRTY years ago, when I was a rookie reporter, a veteran writer offered me sage advice: whenever presented with a government or corporate document that is more than 100 pages long, hunt for hidden bombs.

    Donald Trump’s thousand-page (plus) “big, beautiful Bill” is a case in point. Since the House of Representatives passed it last week, this fiscal act has been (rightly) lambasted for many reasons: it favours the rich over the poor; cruelly cuts social safety nets; and recklessly expands the debt. Even Elon Musk is upset.

    But what investors should also fret about, if they care about the state of Treasuries or are a non-American entity holding US assets, is a clause buried in the bowels of this behemoth called section 899. This would enable the US Treasury to impose penalties on “applicable persons” from “discriminatory foreign countries” by increasing US federal income tax and withholding rates by up to 20 percentage points on their US investments, on a variable scale. It might thus be viewed as a novel “revenge tax” (as some lawyers call it) that Trump could use to bully friends and foes alike in trade negotiations.

    Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services