From trade war to subsidy war
TO THE dismay of many economists, the administration of US President Joe Biden has retained most of its predecessor’s tariffs and trade barriers. In fact, contrary to most analysts’ expectations, the US has imposed additional protectionist measures, such as Biden’s “buy American” policies, resulting in higher costs for American consumers and taxpayers.
During Donald Trump’s presidency, the US imposed a 25 per cent tariff on steel imports and a 10 per cent tariff on imported aluminium. Trump’s administration initiated a trade war with China, withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership that former US presidents George W Bush and Barack Obama negotiated with 12 Pacific Rim countries, and “renegotiated” the North American Free Trade Agreement, rebranding it as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
Trump chose to take these and other actions unilaterally, even though pursuing a multilateral approach through the World Trade Organization would have been far more effective and less likely to harm US allies. The Biden administration, however, has gone even further, fully embracing industrial policy by enacting the US$430 billion Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which includes hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies for green technologies and renewable energies, and the US$280 billion Chips and Science Act, aimed at fostering a robust US semiconductor industry.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Opinion & Features
Singapore offices await a new wave of tenants
Musk has made Tesla a meme stock
The dog ate Japan’s plan to phase out coal power
If inflation continues to build, the Fed won’t be able to maintain neutral stance for long
Beyond US aid, Ukraine needs European allies to step up
S-chip IPOs may be coming again, but don’t count on investors getting too excited