The US and Europe should decouple on monetary policy
Divergent economic positions mean the assessment of policy risks needs to be radically different
AFTER a pandemic, a war in Europe and the worst global inflation for 40 years, central bankers are fully justified in taking a safety-first approach. Seeking to optimise economic outcomes has taken a back seat in favour of managing risks. The big question for the summer is how officials can best set monetary policy with risk management front of mind.
To navigate the economic evidence, central bankers first need to be clear about which risks they are managing. The only ones that matter are those that affect economic activity, inflation and people’s lives.
Too often, central bankers say the worst outcome would be to start a period of interest rate moves and then change their minds. This might be difficult for their personal reputation, but it carries few costs for society. If central bankers follow the path of having to be absolutely sure before taking a decision to move rates, they will guarantee that interest rate moves are late. This can result in genuine costs for others to bear.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
PayPal plans job cuts as its new CEO pursues turnaround strategy
MAS, bank CEOs convene over AI cyberthreats; boards told to own risks, not leave to IT teams