When AI stands for augmented intelligence
By using technology to expose human blind spots, we can improve decision-making – but only if we ensure these systems remain transparent and accountable
IMAGINE you are given a million dollars to invest in a pool of 15 startups. You have two hours to review their pitch decks and make a swift but sound assessment. Do you spread your eggs across several baskets or go big on one outstanding startup?
You mull over your choice, measuring them against your standards of innovativeness and business potential. Drawing on your industry experience, you identify the stars and eliminate the weaker teams. Rinse and repeat.
This is essentially the challenge confronting universities, investors and partners involved in open innovation – how to scale this process of selection and judgment. As universities take on a more active role in nurturing entrepreneurship, they must evaluate startups fairly and allocate scarce resources including funding, mentorship and incubator space to the ventures with the greatest potential.
TRENDING NOW
CSE Global independent director quits after clashes with chairman Eugene Lai over board refresh
What’s wrong with Orchard Road? Experts weigh in on the street’s cachet and its future
‘I felt like dying’: Thai Singha beer scion speaks up after disclosure of alleged sexual abuse
Rare brutalist Singapore house opens to the public before changing hands