Why G7 summit may prove critics wrong
Key decisions were taken on issues, from Ukraine to China and supply chains to AI, that may have strong ramifications in coming years
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
IT IS commonly argued that big multilateral summits rarely matter; however, the recent Group of Seven (G7) summit in Japan may prove the detractors wrong.
The G7 took a series of key decisions that may have strong ramifications in the coming years. This, too, as the club of leading Western economies intensified its transition towards becoming a major geopolitical actor.
One of the biggest potential “forks in the road” here was the decision, more than 450 days into the Ukraine war, for the G7 to reverse its opposition to giving F-16 fighters to Kyiv. This may indicate stronger, longer-term commitment to the war, not least because it will take many months, if not years, to fully train a critical mass of Ukraine’s pilots to use the jets.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
Beijing’s calculated silence on the Iran war
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant