SUBSCRIBERS

Will democracies stand up to Big Brother?

Policymakers should head off the rapid worldwide expansion of AI-enhanced surveillance

    • Surveillance technology is not inherently anti-human. But the right balance must be struck between the benefits and privacy, and we must ensure that AI technologies are not biased.
    • Surveillance technology is not inherently anti-human. But the right balance must be struck between the benefits and privacy, and we must ensure that AI technologies are not biased. PHOTO: PIXABAY
    Published Fri, Jun 16, 2023 · 10:00 AM

    FICTION writers have long imagined scenarios in which every human action is monitored by some malign centralised authority. But now, despite their warnings, we find ourselves careening toward a dystopian future worthy of George Orwell’s 1984. The task of assessing how to protect our rights – as consumers, workers, and citizens – has never been more urgent.

    One sensible proposal is to limit patents on surveillance technologies to discourage their development and overuse. All else being equal, this could tilt the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-related technologies away from surveillance applications – at least in the United States and other advanced economies, where patent protections matter, and where venture capitalists will be reluctant to back companies lacking strong intellectual-property rights.

    But even if such sensible measures are adopted, the world will remain divided between countries with effective safeguards on surveillance and those without them. We, therefore, also need to consider the legitimate basis for trade between these emergent blocs.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services