Will GIC and Temasek’s investments in blacklisted AI firm Anthropic backfire?
Not necessarily; corporate governance – not unconstrained profit – could be the new alpha generator
IT IS tempting for armchair critics to scoff at the latest artificial intelligence (AI) bets made by Singapore’s GIC and Temasek. But investors questioning if this move is a misstep are fundamentally misreading the room.
GIC and Temasek recently sank billions into a funding round that valued Anthropic at a staggering US$380 billion – just weeks before the US Pentagon slapped the AI darling with a “supply chain risk” label.
That designation is usually given to firms associated with foreign adversaries, and it impacts how Anthropic can do business with the US federal government. Specifically, Anthropic’s quarrel with the Pentagon stems from the fact that it refuses to allow its Claude models to be used for mass surveillance of American citizens and fully autonomous weapons systems.
TRENDING NOW
GCash parent Mynt rises in market debut after South-east Asia’s top 2026 IPO
In the age of AI, what is a university education for?
Singapore to use ‘every legal and regulatory lever’ against companies linked to haze: Shanmugam
‘IPOs are not the only vehicle’: KKR heads for record exits even as firms stay private for longer