US in Iraq: Caution is the watchword
THERE is no doubt that Iraq is facing a major humanitarian catastrophe. Forces affiliated with the radical Sunni group, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), have seized areas in the north of the country, massacring members of minority religious groups, including Christians and Yazidis, and forcing them to flee from their homes.
With reports suggesting that ISIS troops were committing genocide and that tens of thousands of Yazidi refugees may be facing death from starvation and heat exhaustion, US President Barack Obama concluded that notwithstanding his commitment to disengage the United States from Iraq, he had no choice but to use US military force to avert a horrific humanitarian catastrophe.
With the Iraqi government and its Kurdish partners unable to resist the onslaught by ISIS, President Obama did the right thing by ordering air strikes against the radical Islamist forces and by providing assistance to the Yazidi refugees. His decision is in line with American values and the principles of the United Nations. The disintegration of Iraq and the establishment of an Islamic state or Caliphate ruled by ISIS in the strategic part of the Middle East run contrary to core US interests and those of its regional and international partners.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access