End of safe-harbour deal: S'pore's position
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
IN June 2013, Maximillian Schrems, a 27-year-old Austrian citizen and regular Facebook user, asked the Irish Data Protection Commissioner to prohibit Facebook Ireland from transferring his personal data to the United States. Mr Schrems's reason for this unusual request was that in view of Edward Snowden's disclosures about surveillance activities by US intelligence services, transfers of personal data to the US were not adequately protected from such surveillance.
The Irish authority dismissed the complaint on the basis of a European Commission (EC) decision in 2000 that adequate protection existed under a EU-US safe-harbour agreement to facilitate cross-border transfers of personal data. The safe-harbour privacy principles allowed US companies to self-certify that they complied with EU adequacy requirements.
However, in a ground-breaking decision on Oct 6, 2015, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) declared the EC's decision to be invalid.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Shelving S$5 billion office redevelopment plan proved ‘wise’ as geopolitical risks mount: OCBC chairman
Eurokars Group introduces rental car franchises Enterprise Rent-A-Car, National Car Rental, and Alamo to Singapore
20 photos that show how dramatically Singapore has changed in two decades
Singapore’s key exports up 15.3% in March from electronics surge, exceeding forecasts