GOP candidates favour sanctions in foreign policy
This aggressive strategy isolates and weakens US enemies through economic sanctions, but may exact greater costs on American firms than on the target state.
IF a Republican is elected US president next year, he will very likely create a much more forceful foreign policy based on a playbook of classic US diplomatic options.
The options range from benign Globalism (US leadership helped globalise the world economy) to Rollback (a policy to eliminate communism abroad with US military power, though this was a spectacular failure).
Between the two extremes is the option of aggressive Containment - a strategy to isolate and weaken US enemies through economic sanctions; however, sanctions impose greater costs on American firms than on the target state, which can find substitute sources of supply and finance.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access