SUBSCRIBERS

Singapore property agencies condemn misrepresentation, but acknowledge grey areas

Jessie  Lim

Jessie Lim

Published Mon, Jan 22, 2024 · 05:00 AM
    • According to the Code of Ethics and Professional Client Care, estate agents and salespersons "must not mislead the client or provide any false information or misrepresent any relevant law or fact to the client”. 
    • According to the Code of Ethics and Professional Client Care, estate agents and salespersons "must not mislead the client or provide any false information or misrepresent any relevant law or fact to the client”.  PHOTO: YEN MENG JIIN, BT

    MISREPRESENTATION claims have surfaced in Singapore courts recently, with buyers taking legal action against property agents for allegedly making claims about the properties they purchased, which later turned out to be untrue.

    While agency leaders have condemned misrepresentation, lawyers said that there can be many grey areas when it comes to distinguishing between sales talk and false representations of fact.

    Last year, two notable cases of misrepresentation were heard in court. The first involved an agent from Realstar Premier Group who was accused by a buyer for passing on a marketing brochure for a good Class Bungalow (GCB) from the seller. The brochure allegedly painted a false picture of the GCB’s redevelopment potential. 

    Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.