UK freezes £5m home tied to Petrobras scandal

London

BRITISH prosecutors have frozen a £5 million (S$8.75 million) apartment in west London owned by a Brazilian businessman implicated in the Petrobras bribery scandal.

The UK's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) believes the property in leafy Kensington was bought with money "linked to corrupt funds", Judge Johannah Cutts said in a ruling this month.

She said prosecutors sought to tie the apartment to Julio Faerman, who agreed to pay US$54 million to the Brazilian authorities investigating the alleged bribery in the state-owned oil producer Petroleo Brasileiro, known as Petrobras.

The "civil recovery" investigation came to light following a London court hearing, at which attorneys for Mr Faerman unsuccessfully tried to get the SFO to drop requests for further information on his finances.

The prosecutors have been seeking to trace funds from Swiss bank accounts held by a series of offshore companies, the judge said.

A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU

Tuesday, 12 pm

Property Insights

Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.

Sign Up

The SFO applied to freeze the property in January 2019.

The SFO said in a statement: "This judgment makes clear that there is a clear and compelling public interest in maintaining this disclosure order. We are committed to preventing those who bribe, cheat and steal from enjoying their ill-gotten gains in this country."

Mr Faerman, who worked as an agent for Dutch firm SBM Offshore to win contracts from Petrobras, signed a "cooperation agreement" with the Brazilian authorities in 2015.

SBM agreed to pay US$238 million and its US unit pleaded guilty to resolve allegations that it bribed officials in five countries, including Brazil.

At the time of the freezing order last year, the SFO's investigator said she intended to request further information from "financial institutions and professional advisers, including accountants and solicitors", the judge said.

Mr Faerman's attorneys argued that the request for information should not have been issued because the businessman was outside the country. BLOOMBERG