Singapore consumer watchdog raps Courts, Prism+ for misleading website features

The watchdog urges consumers to review their shopping carts, verify payment amounts and question urgency claims

Shikhar Gupta
Published Mon, Dec 8, 2025 · 01:27 PM
    • Courts has automatically added unsolicited items into consumers’ shopping carts, while Prism+ has used fake countdown timers and misleading stock indicators.
    • Courts has automatically added unsolicited items into consumers’ shopping carts, while Prism+ has used fake countdown timers and misleading stock indicators. PHOTO: BT FILE

    [SINGAPORE] The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) said it has taken action against Courts and Prism+ for using website design features to mislead consumers.

    Courts automatically added unsolicited items into consumers’ shopping carts, while Prism+ used fake countdown timers and misleading stock indicators to pressure consumers into purchases, said the watchdog on Monday (Dec 8).

    CCCS chief executive Alvin Koh said: “These two interventions form part of a series of recent enforcement actions taken by CCCS against businesses that employ dark patterns to mislead and pressure consumers into unintended purchases.”

    Unsolicited items in checkout carts, unverified claims

    During certain promotion periods, Courts’ website automatically added items to consumers’ carts without seeking their consent. An example was given of an Acer vacuum cleaner added to a consumer’s cart after an Apple iPad was added for purchase.

    Despite receiving customer complaints as early as 2024, Courts took no action until the intervention of CCCS in June this year. The retailer has now changed its website and agreed to refund affected consumers.

    Meanwhile, Prism+ had four website features aimed at pressuring consumers into making hasty purchases. These were a fake countdown timer, misleading stock indicators, unsubstantiated shortage claims and inflated discounts.

    CCCS said the electronics manufacturer has rectified these issues and provided an undertaking that it will not engage in any unfair trade practices.

    CCCS found that the Prism+ website had messages exhorting customers to purchase the item they were considering within the next few minutes to “secure stock” appeared on checkout pages. The watchdog pointed out that these timers had not been linked to any of Prism+’s inventory systems and simply reset after reaching zero without affecting the checkout process.

    Elsewhere, an “In Stock: Running Low” message appeared on product pages on the Prism+ website even when “substantial inventory” was still available, said CCCS.

    For one product, this indicator was displayed even though monthly sales figures represented only 7 per cent of the item’s total available stock. That indicator was used for any product with inventory levels above 100 units, and a “Few Units Left: Hurry” message was displayed under that threshold.

    CCCS also found that statements claiming “supply chain disruption” and “industry-wide” shortages appeared on product pages on the Prism+ website. The electronics maker could not substantiate such statements to CCCS and claimed that they were made in the context of the pandemic.

    Additionally, the discounts of 10 Prism+ products against the original price were listed as “up to 67 per cent off”, said CCCS. However, the maximum discount of 67 per cent was “unachievable” as the actual discounts provided did not amount to that percentage of the undiscounted price of the products.

    For one product, the discount only amounted to 38 per cent of the strike-through price, in contrast to the larger discount claim. Prism+ attributed this to technical errors, said CCCS.

    “Under Singapore’s fair trading laws, it is an unfair trade practice for businesses to charge for the supply of unsolicited products, or to make false or misleading claims to pressure consumers into making purchases,” said CCCS in its statement.

    The watchdog also urged consumers to review their shopping carts for unexpected items, verify payment amounts with intended purchases and question urgency claims.

    Prism+ said in a statement that it “acknowledges” the CCCS findings regarding a “small number of legacy marketing practices” on its website, including “genuine unintentional errors”.

    “All required corrections were made swiftly within days, and strengthened safeguards have since been implemented,” added Prism+. “Since May 2025, all prices and discounts displayed on our website accurately reflect the offers available and real-time stock availability is based on current inventory levels.”

    In a statement on Dec 9, Courts said the issues flagged by CCCS were due to “legacy marketing practices” where customers in its physical stores were offered the option to buy an additional item at a discounted rate after they purchased an item.

    “After being made aware of the issue, Courts (gave) an undertaking to CCCS to cease this practice immediately. Following which, we have made changes to our website to rectify the issue and processed refunds to all affected customers,” said the retailer, adding that the issue has been fully rectified since September 2025.

    “We have also reviewed our website thoroughly to ensure all information (is) accurately displayed, so as to deliver a transparent shopping experience for customers and to minimise confusion,” added Courts.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.