‘Inserting evidence between the lines’: Parties argue over claims of oral agreements
Megan Cheah
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
THE shareholder oppression trial brought by restaurateur Violet Oon against her business partner continued on Wednesday (Jul 12), with parties sparring over the existence of verbal promises that Oon’s family alleged had been given to them.
Tay Su-Lyn, Oon’s daughter and a director at Violet Oon Singapore, said during cross-examination that the business partner, Group MMM director Manoj Murjani, had face-to-face meetings with the family. She said that Manoj had threatened to sue the family and wind up Violet Oon Singapore if the family did not pay money to Group MMM for allegedly increasing their salaries without his consent.
In December 2014, Oon was paid a monthly salary of S$5,000, Tay Su-Lyn, S$1,000, and Oon’s son, Tay Yiming, S$4,500. In November 2018, Oon and her son were drawing S$8,000 each per month, and her daughter, S$5,000 a month.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
Beijing’s calculated silence on the Iran war
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant