SGSME logo
VIOLET OON TRIAL
·
SUBSCRIBERS

‘Inserting evidence between the lines’: Parties argue over claims of oral agreements

Megan Cheah

Megan Cheah

Published Wed, Jul 12, 2023 · 10:55 PM
    • Violet Oon (seated), with (standing, from left Tay Yiming, Manoj Murjani and Tay Su-lyn. Tay Su-Lyn is the second witness in a civil case she, her mother and her brother Tay Yiming brought against Murjani, alleging oppression.
    • Violet Oon (seated), with (standing, from left Tay Yiming, Manoj Murjani and Tay Su-lyn. Tay Su-Lyn is the second witness in a civil case she, her mother and her brother Tay Yiming brought against Murjani, alleging oppression. PHOTO: ST FILE

    THE shareholder oppression trial brought by restaurateur Violet Oon against her business partner continued on Wednesday (Jul 12), with parties sparring over the existence of verbal promises that Oon’s family alleged had been given to them.

    Tay Su-Lyn, Oon’s daughter and a director at Violet Oon Singapore, said during cross-examination that the business partner, Group MMM director Manoj Murjani, had face-to-face meetings with the family. She said that Manoj had threatened to sue the family and wind up Violet Oon Singapore if the family did not pay money to Group MMM for allegedly increasing their salaries without his consent.

    In December 2014, Oon was paid a monthly salary of S$5,000, Tay Su-Lyn, S$1,000, and Oon’s son, Tay Yiming, S$4,500. In November 2018, Oon and her son were drawing S$8,000 each per month, and her daughter, S$5,000 a month.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.