Grab-Uber deal: CCCS' findings blasted
Verdict was expected, but some question basis for the decision and panel's weak stand on subsidy controls
THE Grab-Uber merger was declared an infringement of the competition act by Singapore's competition authority on Thursday. It was a verdict that did not come as a surprise - but the justification for it floored many, including of course, Grab.
Lee Der-Horng, director of the NUS-LTA Transport Research Centre, was among the more critical observers. He told The Business Times: "It really is an amusement to me. I could not help but laugh at the provisional findings by the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS), which are mostly based on assumptions and speculation."
He cited CCCS' chief finding which stated "Uber would not have left the Singapore market in the near to medium term in the absence of the transaction" and that "Uber had entered into an agreement to collaborate with ComfortDelGro with the introduction of UberFlash to compete with Grab, and the collaboration was only withdrawn after the transaction".
TRENDING NOW
Singapore at 61: How we can ensure opportunity, security and ownership for the next generation
The S$1 million National Day paradox: ‘money dysmorphia’ amid a wealth surge
Over 2.4 million adult Singaporeans to get special S$400-S$600 cash payment in September
Why Asean matters more than ever to the UK and Singapore