Unity Software rejects AppLovin's takeover offer, to stick with ironSource
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
UNITY Software on Monday (Aug 15) rejected gaming software company AppLovin's US$17.54 billion takeover offer and said it would go ahead with its deal to purchase mobile app monetisation software company ironSource.
AppLovin last week offered to buy Unity in a US$17.54 billion all-stock deal, on condition Unity terminated its plans to acquire AppLovin's smaller competitor ironSource.
Unity's platform, which has been used to build some of the most-played games such as Call of Duty: Mobile and Pokemon Go, is used for developing mobile, console and computer videogames, while ironSource's platform allows developers to publish and scale mobile games and other apps.
Unity said on Monday AppLovin's offer was not in the best interest of shareholders and "would not reasonably be expected to result in a 'Superior Proposal' as defined in Unity's merger agreement with ironSource."
"The Board continues to believe that the ironSource transaction is compelling and will deliver an opportunity to generate long-term value," Unity's chief executive officer John Riccitiello said in a statement.
AppLovin was not immediately available for a comment.
Navigate Asia in
a new global order
Get the insights delivered to your inbox.
Unity said last month it would buy ironSource in a US$4.4 billion all-stock transaction, which the company said on Monday it remains committed to.
Shares of Unity were down about 4 per cent in trading before the bell. REUTERS
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Vietnam formalises new state leadership, redefining ‘four pillars’ power balance
‘Largest Singapore commercial S-Reit proxy’: analysts say buy CICT shares after Paragon acquisition
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Why where you park your joint venture matters: Lessons from a US$689 million shareholder dispute