Unity Software rejects AppLovin's takeover offer, to stick with ironSource
UNITY Software on Monday (Aug 15) rejected gaming software company AppLovin's US$17.54 billion takeover offer and said it would go ahead with its deal to purchase mobile app monetisation software company ironSource.
AppLovin last week offered to buy Unity in a US$17.54 billion all-stock deal, on condition Unity terminated its plans to acquire AppLovin's smaller competitor ironSource.
Unity's platform, which has been used to build some of the most-played games such as Call of Duty: Mobile and Pokemon Go, is used for developing mobile, console and computer videogames, while ironSource's platform allows developers to publish and scale mobile games and other apps.
Unity said on Monday AppLovin's offer was not in the best interest of shareholders and "would not reasonably be expected to result in a 'Superior Proposal' as defined in Unity's merger agreement with ironSource."
"The Board continues to believe that the ironSource transaction is compelling and will deliver an opportunity to generate long-term value," Unity's chief executive officer John Riccitiello said in a statement.
AppLovin was not immediately available for a comment.
Navigate Asia in
a new global order
Get the insights delivered to your inbox.
Unity said last month it would buy ironSource in a US$4.4 billion all-stock transaction, which the company said on Monday it remains committed to.
Shares of Unity were down about 4 per cent in trading before the bell. REUTERS
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
That ‘cheap’ Malaysia condo could cost Singapore buyers far more than they think
Gojek founder Nadiem Makarim faces 18-year jail demand in Indonesia laptop graft trial
China’s regional slowdown: Painful but necessary?